The Good and Bad of Groupsets for Gravel Cycling: 2019 Edition

The world of component groups for cycling, particularly for gravel bikes, mostly revolves around two companies, SRAM and Shimano. Both companies are giants in the bicycle industry, their influence upon bikes, ergonomics, standards, usability, functionality and more reaches far and wide.

But there are at least two more complete drivetrain manufacturers in the marketplace. One would be the oldest complete drivetrain manufacturer in the world, Campagnolo, and a recent addition for a complete groupset manufacturer, Full Speed Ahead, aka FSA.

There are a few smaller companies who could potentially make this article, but I’m covering complete groupsets only; this means drop-bar shifters, cranks, disc brakes, derailleurs and so on.

Let’s kick the list off with the lesser-known of all these options, Full Speed Ahead.

FSA K-Force WE Disc Brake

You may not know it, FSA released a complete drivetrain approximately two years ago, known as K-Force WE.

“FSA presents its first drivetrain: after years of study and development, K-Force WE is ready to ride. K-Force WE is a high-tech electronic groupset with an elegant design. A unique product that will make you change the way you ride your bike. Long battery life, different size levers and wireless technology at the shifters for smooth, quiet and precise shifting”.

good and bad of groupsets for gravel cycling

Availability has been the biggest hurdle with FSA WE, particularly the disc brake versions, which have mostly been seen on NAHBS display bikes and little else. I’ve been eagerly awaiting an FSA WE disc brake groupset for review, but in the meantime, I have procured a mostly complete rim brake version of the groupset barring a few important components; namely the rear derailleur, derailleur / battery connector wires and battery charger. Effectively, quite useless until those parts are obtained… watch this space.

good and bad of groupsets for gravel cycling

Thus, the jury is out on this groupset but the facts are:

  • Electronic 11-speed, semi-wireless system. That means, the battery (which resides in the seatpost) connects physically with a wire to the front and rear derailleurs. The shifters wirelessly communicate with the derailleurs and are powered by CR2032 coin cell batteries.
  • 2x only – The brains of the FSA WE unit are contained in the front derailleur. This may change in the future?
  • The rear derailleur does not have a clutch at this time.
  • Long battery life, likely akin to Shimano Di2.

Campagnolo Mechanical Disc Brake Groupsets

Campagnolo has stepped up their game. No longer known for the most stylish groupsets currently available on the market today, they do offer legitimate disc brake options for mechanical and electronic drivetrains. For EPS, Campagnolo’s electronic drivetrain, the disc brake version is only available in Super Record EPS, and the chainring options are all geared towards road. Additionally, Super Record EPS is a wee bit pricey and I couldn’t see myself ever getting it covered in crud!

good and bad of groupsets for gravel cycling
Campagnolo Super Record EPS

Campagnolo offers Super Record, Record, Chorus and Potenza. All of these groups are 2 x 12-speed groupsets with the exception of Potenza, which is 11-speed.

good and bad of groupsets for gravel cycling
Campagnolo Super Record EPS

Super Record, Record and Potenza are being dropped from this article because their chainring tooth counts are all geared for road use. That leaves Campagnolo Chorus 12-speed. That is a shame with Potenza because an aluminium groupset generally lends itself better to the rigors of gravel cycling. The Potenza 50/34 chainrings may be fine for some riders, but honestly, most of us prefer 48T, 46T, or lower options for 2x drivetrains.

Campagnolo Chorus 2x 12-Speed:

“New Chorus DB 12-speed groupset: the Campagnolo product that combines racing performance with the needs of Endurance.”

“Designed for unforgettable outings where the entire day is spent in the saddle, the specific combinations of the Chorus 2×12 make it a versatile, simple and high-performance groupset, however it’s used: from Granfondo rides to adventurous Sunday spins to quick blasts on the bike after work.”

Campagnolo Chorus 2x 12-Speed – The Good:

  • 12-speed, more cogs are good!
  • Chorus offers a carbon crankset with 48/32 gearing, but only in 172.5mm
  • Excellent cassette options – 11-29 (11-12-13-14-15-16-17-19-21-23-26-29), 11-32 (11-12-13-14-15-16-17-19-22-25-28-32) and 11-34 (11-12-13-14-15-16-17-19-22-25-29-34)
  • The final three cogs of the 11-34 are 25-29-34 and are pieced together as one unit. This part can be purchased separately, and can also be used to convert your 11-32 to 11-34
  • Stylish and looks good even when dirty
  • I love the functionality of Campagnolo’s mechanical gearshifting, but it isn’t for everyone. However, the up and downshifts use distinctly different levers / buttons, so there is no chance of pushing the wrong one

Campagnolo Chorus 2x 12-Speed – The Bad:

  • 2x only, no 1x option, sorry people. Not a bad thing in my opinion as 1x isn’t really my bag. I cite annoying cassette gaps and so on 🙂 I doubt we’ll see 1x from Campagnolo unless they first make a push for 1x road bikes
  • Chorus crankset with 48/32 gearing is 172.5mm only
  • No clutch option at this time. Maybe never?
  • Campagnolo Potenza with a 46/30 or 48/32 crankset would make for a great option, especially paired with a Chorus 11-34 cassette
  • Cassettes are expensive, much like everything Campagnolo, and they require their own cassette body. However, Campagnolo has been an innovator in the road market; the first company to produce 10-Speed, 11-Speed and 12-Speed.

Shimano Mechanical Disc Brake Groupsets

Shimano produces a range of groupsets at various price points for most budgets. However, this article will focus on the groupsets that are geared towards gravel, or are most commonly spec’d on gravel bikes. In this case, that would be Shimano’s latest and greatest groupset designed specifically for gravel cycling, GRX, and Ultegra with the RX rear derailleur. Shimano 105 and Tiagra, etc, are generally spec’d on lower priced bikes, but are being left from the article in the interest of keeping this article somewhat short.

Shimano GRX 1x and 2x 11-Speed:

“Following a multi-year global market study, product testing and development process, Shimano introduce the world’s first dedicated gravel component line: SHIMANO GRX. New for the 2020 model year, the SHIMANO GRX 800 series offers 1×11 and 2×11 drivetrains – with mechanical and Di2 electronic options – that allow riders to tailor their mixed surface riding experience and Explore Beyond.”

Shimano also offer a 10-Speed GRX option, but 11-Speed is the focus here.

good and bad of groupsets for gravel cycling

Shimano GRX Mechanical 1x and 2x 11-Speed – The Good:

  • 11-Speed, cassettes are mostly affordable and can be interchanged among the entire Shimano range. The 1x cassettes that I like to think of as reconstituted MTB cassettes from the XT and XTR range, will fit onto a 10-Speed Shimano body… that tells me Shimano could get away with 12-Speed on their current 11-Speed cassette bodies, provided the first position cog is large enough to avoid touching the hub.
  • Shimano did their homework with 2x gearing. 48/31 on the 2x covers just about every base and road surface I can think of. Like to ride your gravel bike on the road with roadie tyres? 48T is plenty big enough to do that and hang with a group ride. 48T isn’t that big that it is useless on gravel. The 31T small chainring is sublime, offering micro-compact gearing especially when paired with Shimano’s 11-32 and 11-34 cassettes.
  • Shimano’s 1x gearing is mostly an extension of their MTB cassettes but there are multiple chainrings to choose from to make most 1x people happy.
  • Excellent cassette options for 2x – R8000 11-32 (11-12-13-14-16-18-20-22-25-28-32T) and HG-800 11-34 (11-13-15-17-19-21-23-25-27-30-34). Granted, there are some less than desirable gaps on the 11-34, but this cassette is pure gold when there is plenty of climbing on tap.
  • GRX clutch derailleur gets the job done in all weather, and the derailleur works nicely in good weather sans the clutch. Some resistance when the clutch is in operation is a small trade-off for stellar mud performance.
  • The GRX 2x derailleur will shift all the way up to a 40T cog, but Shimano doesn’t recommend anything beyond a 34T cog. However, I have proved 40T works on the GRX Di2 2x derailleur, which shares the same length cage as the mechanical version.
  • Shimano’s brake / shifter ergonomics are so good.
  • Shifting is almost on par with Di2 provided new housings and cables are present.
  • Crosstop brake lever option is superb, provides riders with another hand and braking position from the tops of the handlebar.
  • Braking is improved with the higher pivot point of the GRX shifter lever, and less of that “hyperspace” feeling… meaning, the brake pads make contact with the rotor sooner, with less movement of the brake lever.
  • On GRX 1x, the left shifter can be configured to trigger a dropper seatpost.

I may have a review of the GRX 11-speed 1x or 2x mechanical system coming in the future?

Shimano GRX Mechanical 1x and 2x 11-Speed – The Bad:

  • Honestly, it is difficult for me to think of anything negative about the GRX mechanical groupset, but…
  • 46/30 chainrings should be an option at the 11-Speed level for GRX. I’m hoping we’ll see that released in 2020?
  • An 11-36 cassette (SRAM makes one, the PG-1170 and it works with GRX). Shimano’s 31T x 34T gear is low and a really nice option, but if you’ve ridden in the mountains of Georgia, North Carolina, or West Virginia, I’ve never heard anyone wishing for bigger gears on super steep climbs. The 11-36 would be even nicer.
  • 1x folks will be remiss there is 12-Speed for Shimano XTR but not for GRX. A 12th cog can make a difference on 1x.
  • Low on the style points register, but this stuff just plain works.

Shimano Ultegra RX Mechanical 2x 11-Speed:

“With an integrated chain stabilizer mechanism, the ULTEGRA RX derailleur provides a quieter experience and shifting security and precision on mixed terrain. For rides on smooth surfaces, the derailleur features and ON/OFF switch for the chain tensioner.”

Ultegra has always been a road groupset, and until the recent release of GRX, it was the go-to groupset for most gravel bikes priced around or greater than $US 3,000. Shimano did themselves no favors by adding the clutch option with the RX derailleur, as this only made the groupset even more versatile. Some people question the point of GRX when Ultegra RX is still available on the market. Having ridden both extensively, they each have their place.

Shimano Ultegra RX Mechanical 2x 11-Speed – The Good:

  • 11-speed, cassettes are affordable and can be interchanged among the entire Shimano range.
  • Ultegra is a road groupset, so the gearing is optimized for road with 53/39, 52/36, 50/34 but the lesser-known cyclocross option, 46/36, provides options.
  • 46/36 is the pick of the Ultegra line-up for chainrings on gravel, as the 36T small chainring can easily and cheaply be replaced with a 34T ring from Shimano. Alternatively, there is a third-party option made by Wickwerks, that allows you to install a 33T small chainring onto an R8000 series crankset. This is my Ultegra go-to setup circa 2019, and exactly what I used during my review of the Moots Routt 45.
  • The same excellent cassette options for GRX work with the Ultegra RX rear derailleur. Additionally, the RX derailleur will also shift to a 40T cog. Don’t believe me? I tested Dura-Ace Di2 9150 which has a shorter cage successfully with an 11-40 cassette.
  • The Ultegra RX clutch derailleur gets the job done in all weather, same as with the GRX derailleur. Here is the Ultegra RX Di2 derailleur at work in a muddy edition of the Red Hills Ride to Fight Diabetes in Georgia, USA.
  • Ultegra’s mechanical shifting is almost on par with Di2 with new cables installed.

Shimano Ultegra RX Mechanical 2x 11-Speed – The Bad:

  • Chainring options are not optimized for gravel, but many gravel bikes still spec’ing Ultegra RX are utilizing third party crank options by companies such as Easton and Praxis.
  • Ultegra 2x 11-Speed is yesterday’s news for road, perception may be that a new bike spec’d with Ultegra RX 11-Speed is substantially lesser in performance than one with GRX, which itself is an 11-Speed system.
  • There isn’t much else bad to say about Ultegra, it is simply that good… almost on par with Dura-Ace but a little more weight.

Shimano Electronic Disc Brake Groupsets

I’ve always thought highly of electronic shifting ever since Mavic brought their 8-Speed Zap system to market around 1993 (my Zap gruppos still work!), and later, the admittedly dodgy wireless version of Zap, Mektronic 9-Speed. Call me a Shimano fanboy, in my opinion, Shimano has set the benchmark for electronic shifting with Di2. Do you need it? No. Does it work better than mechanical shifting in the foulest of weather? Yes. Will it ruin your life if you ever ride it? Yes! It is so good, Jay Petervary rides GRX Di2 exclusively, and most of us know he pushes his body and bike to extremes…

good and bad of groupsets for gravel cycling
Shimano GRX Di2

I’ve been riding Di2 since the original 10-Speed Dura-Ace 7970 groupset was released around 2009. Every version of Di2 has proven bombproof reliable, and these people who make stupid claims about the battery dying during a ride don’t understand how simple it is to check the battery level. In the case of 2x, place the chain onto the small chainring, then hold down the small chainring button and whala! Battery status light will display on Junction Box A.

This brings us to Shimano’s electronic groupsets that are relevant on gravel; Shimano GRX Di2 and Ultegra RX Di2.

good and bad of groupsets for gravel cycling
Shimano GRX Di2

Shimano GRX Di2 1x and 2x 11-Speed:

The same cranks and brakes as Shimano GRX mechanical, and that’s where the similarities end. Electronic front and rear derailleurs for GRX Di2, battery, wiring, junction boxes and the option of additional shifters for climbing, etc.

good and bad of groupsets for gravel cycling

Shimano GRX Di2 1x and 2x 11-Speed – The Good:

  • The same positives of mechanical Shimano GRX apply to Di2, except the shifting is even better.
  • Di2 can save a rider’s energy. Just think, an average rider will execute somewhere between 3,000 and 4,000 gear shifts for a 200-mile gravel race such as Dirty Kanza. With Di2, a button push executes a gear shift. With mechanical, more energy is used, particularly during upshifts on the rear derailleur, and shifting to the big chainring assuming a 2x system. Need further Di2 intel? Di2Stats.com is home to all of the Di2 shifting data you could ever wish for.
  • Excellent battery life.
  • Plenty of customizing options for shifting. Multi-shift, synchro, semi-synchro and so on.
  • Easy adjustments of the system on the fly. One can place the bike into adjustment mode from Junction Box A, and tweak derailleur alignment, etc, whilst still riding.
  • The same higher pivot point for the brake lever crosses over to Di2.
  • Climbing shifters, etc, rule!

I am reviewing GRX Di2 2x long-term with the crosstop levers, watch this space!

good and bad of groupsets for gravel cycling

Shimano GRX Di2 2x 11-Speed – The Bad:

  • How do you find anything wrong with Shimano GRX Di2?
  • Nitpicking… if you set up your own bike, running the Di2 wiring can be a painful process, but it is set and forget. A moot point if you ask me.
  • Wireless access to Di2 for firmware and configuration using the EW-WU111 module is flaky.
  • The same minor gripes about 46/30 chainrings and 11-36 cassettes apply to GRX Di2.
  • Some people complain Di2 isn’t wireless. I understand that point, but to me, wireless has only two advantages; a travel bike such as the Ritchey Breakaway CX, and initial system setup.
  • The groupset doesn’t win style points if that’s your thing.

good and bad of groupsets for gravel cycling

Shimano Ultegra RX Di2 2x 11-Speed – The Good:

  • The same positive points of GRX Di2 apply to Ultegra RX Di2.
  • Road groupset but adapts well to gravel – see my review of the Ocoee Boundary.

good and bad of groupsets for gravel cycling

Shimano Ultegra RX Di2 2x 11-Speed – The Bad:

  • Not as relevant now that GRX Di2 is on the market.
  • Gearing is mostly optimized for road, but read my earlier points about the 46/36T chainring pairing.

SRAM Mechanical Disc Brake Groupsets

SRAM produces a range of groupsets at various price points for most budgets. Like Shimano earlier, this article will focus on the groupsets that are geared towards gravel, or are most commonly spec’d on gravel bikes. In this case, that would be SRAM’s Force, Rival and Apex groupsets… but the 1x versions.

I hear you asking, why aren’t the 2x versions of these SRAM groupsets receiving any love? Based on my observations of SRAM spec’d bikes over the years, unless I’ve missed it, every single SRAM-equipped gravel bike is 1x. In fact, I questioned a SRAM engineer at the final Las Vegas Interbike show, about the issue of SRAM eTap version one (the 11-speed version), not having enough clearance between the front derailleur battery and the rear tyre. His answer? Gravel is 1x, the front derailleur isn’t needed. Err… OK then.

With that said, SRAM offers the following crankset options for 2x if you are so inclined; 46/36 for Force 2x, 46/34 for SRAM Rival (S-390 crankset) and 46/34, and 48/34 for Apex.

good and bad of groupsets for gravel cycling

SRAM Force Mechanical 1x 11-Speed – The Good:

  • 11-Speed, PG1170 cassettes are affordable and compatible with Shimano’s 11-Speed cassette body. However, for a wider range of gears, you’ll need something like the XG-1175 cassette which has a range of 10T-42T and relies on SRAM’s XD driver.
  • Good cassette ratios with PG1170, particularly the 11-32 (11,12,13,14,15,17,19,22,25,28,32) and the 11-36 (11,12,13,15,17,19,22,25,28,32,36) – the gaps aren’t terrible, but remember, the smallest chainring on Force 1x without going third party is 38T.
  • The first component manufacturer to feature a derailleur with an integrated clutch.
  • Shift / brake levers are comfy in the hand.
  • The first component manufacturer to utilize the functionality of a shifter ordinarily designed for shifting a front derailleur, and reconstitute it to trigger a dropper seatpost.
  • A lot of people poo poo SRAM’s brakes (they use DOT fluid), but I’ve found their feel and performance to be excellent. Plenty of power and modulation, and their feel is reminiscent to me of a really tight set of rim brake calipers. Almost instant pad on rotor once you depress the brake lever, something I really like.
  • Flat-bar shifter option.

good and bad of groupsets for gravel cycling

SRAM Force Mechanical 1x 11-Speed – The Bad:

  • Honestly, SRAM is just killing themselves not pushing 2x as an option for OEM (original equipment manufacturer) on gravel bikes. Their thought that 1x is for gravel is just plain silly to me. People want options. I don’t like 1x too much, but some people love it. Give riders what they want, versus forcing options down their throat.
  • Double-tap shifting feels clunky to me. With practice, you can avoid over-shifting back up the cassette, but the one shift paddle on SRAM is a single point of failure in my mind. I’ve never liked this design.
  • DOT brake fluid should be for cars, not bicycles. Mineral oil is where it’s at.

SRAM Rival Mechanical 1x 11-Speed – The Good:

  • All of the good points from SRAM Force Mechanical apply here.
  • Technology has trickled down from Force, Red, etc, but you pay less money, an example is the 10-42T PG1130 cassette.
  • 11-32T cassette option (11,12,13,14,15,17,19,22,25,28,32)

SRAM Rival Mechanical 1x 11-Speed – The Bad:

  • Only two cassette options worth mentioning, the rest are more road-oriented.
  • The 11-32T cassette is great for a 2x crank, but paired to a SRAM Force 1x crankset with the smallest chainring option being 38T, this is less than optimal.

SRAM Apex Mechanical 1x 11-Speed – The Good:

  • All of the good points from SRAM Force Mechanical apply here.
  • Technology has trickled down from Force, Red, etc.
  • Attractive pricing.

SRAM Apex Mechanical 1x 11-Speed – The Bad:

  • No Apex specific cassette options, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

SRAM eTap AXS (Electronic) Disc Brake Groupsets

“Road riders are going beyond where we’ve ever gone before. We’re going further and faster. And when the road stops, we keep going. One thing hasn’t changed: We want to push those boundaries without any distractions. Exploring new limits has never been easier. SRAM RED and Force eTap AXS™—Simply Beyond.”

good and bad of groupsets for gravel cycling
SRAM Force AXS 1x “Mullet” build

SRAM eTap AXS is arguably the most intuitive of all the electronic groupsets available on the market. Rather than configure their electronic shifters to mimic an electronic version of a mechanical shifter, SRAM relies on a simple concept; left side shifter button – shift the derailleur left to an easier gear, right side shifter button – shift the derailleur right to a harder gear. For 2x, pressing both shifter buttons simultaneously triggers a front derailleur shift, up or down, depending on its current position. You can do other clever stuff such as trigger an AXS compatible wireless seatpost.

good and bad of groupsets for gravel cycling
SRAM Red AXS 12-Speed 10-33 Cassette

SRAM’s eTap design may have come into existence to get around an electronic shifter patent?, but no matter the case, eTap is super easy to use. I have detailed posts about the SRAM Red AXS system here, and the SRAM Force AXS system here, (Force AXS review here) so I won’t go into super detail, but crack on with the good and bad of both systems.

good and bad of groupsets for gravel cycling

SRAM Red AXS eTap 1x and 2x 12-Speed – The Good:

  • 12-Speed, who doesn’t love another cog!
  • Super easy shifting, speed is improved over the original 11-Speed eTap.
  • Tons of customizing options with the AXS phone app.
  • The easiest electronic system for the initial setup. No wires to run, and easy to adjust the rear derailleur whilst still riding.
  • Fluid clutch works well in mud and saves weight and complexity versus a true mechanical clutch.
  • Cassettes are incredibly easy to install as they are one piece.
  • 1x “Mullet” build is easy to do with a SRAM Eagle AXS 12-Speed derailleur.
  • Blip shifters provide additional places to shift gears, love it!

good and bad of groupsets for gravel cycling

SRAM Red AXS eTap 1x and 2x 12-Speed – The Bad:

  • Expensive!
  • SRAM’s X-Range gearing technology is great for road bikes, but falls short on gravel
  • 2x 46/33 gearing on the crankset is OK, but 46/31 or 46/30 options would be better.
  • The 10-33 cassette is an absolute work of engineering art, but the 10T cog is mostly a waste of time on gravel. SRAM, please produce an 11-36T 12-Speed cassette, this would greatly help the 46/33 chainring pairing. Additionally, the cassettes are far too expensive, so a smart consumer would substitute for Force level come replacement time.
  • 1x 36T chainring is too big when paired with the 10-33 cassette.
  • Derailleur battery life falls short versus Campagnolo, Shimano and FSA.
  • Four batteries to worry about – front (2x) and rear derailleur, and shifter batteries. Admittedly, the shifter batteries last forever. My original 11-Speed batteries from over two years ago are still going strong! However, carrying a spare derailleur battery is highly recommended (they are very small).
  • Potential front derailleur clearance issues between the tyre and would-be mud still exist.
  • XDR cassette driver is yet another standard for wheels.
  • “Mullet” build 1x may have 500% range with the Eagle 10-50T cassette, but its highly annoying gaps are amplified at this level.

good and bad of groupsets for gravel cycling

SRAM Force AXS eTap 1x and 2x 12-Speed – The Good:

  • All of the positives of Red AXS eTap apply.
  • Considerably less costly than Red. Unless you’re into saving a small amount of weight, Force AXS eTap is a winner.
  • Cassettes are somewhat affordable.

good and bad of groupsets for gravel cycling

SRAM Force AXS eTap 1x and 2x 12-Speed – The Bad:

  • The same negatives from Red AXS eTap apply barring the Force level cassettes.
  • If you’re into the game of replacing individual cogs, that isn’t possible of any of SRAM’s one-piece cassettes.

Summary

Hopefully you found this article useful on my take of what’s good and bad about the current groupset offerings I consider relevant for gravel bikes. Helpful feedback is welcomed, thanks for reading!

36 comments on “The Good and Bad of Groupsets for Gravel Cycling: 2019 Edition

  1. Great write up JOM! I agree that both SRAM and Shimano have fallen short on the cassette options and that an 11-36 is overdue for Shimano. And, since Shimano doesn’t offer a 12 speed I’d even love to see a 12-36. Pairing this with a third party crankset like Rotor’s 48/32 or 46/30 would go a long way to providing us old-timers with bailout gearing on both road and gravel. And let’s be honest, how many of us are cranking a 48/11 full gas when descending? Doesn’t it make more sense to offer tighter 1 gear jumps on the high end? SRAM did, I think, get that concept right.

  2. SRAM eTap AXS is brilliant on the road but the gearing is horrible for gravel. It amazes me how many gravel bikes are coming stock with the Force AXS 1x group and how few are coming with GRX Di2 which, in my opinion, offers the perfect gearing combinations for 1x and 2x builds. I’m guessing SRAM is offering really good OEM deals on Force AXS to get it on as many bikes as possible.

  3. Ultimately, I would have prefered a wide range (500% or more) 1x drivetrain. All Sram or Shimano need to do is create a cable-actuated dropbar brake-lever/shifter for their pre-existing 1×12 drivetrains. Everything else is just second best. I don’t want 2x and I don’t want electronic shifting.

  4. Great write up JOM! Super informative on the various groupset options. While, I very much like my Sram Force 1 set up and how it shifts. I agree with you, Sram should offer a better 2x options for gravel and cross. They are at risk of being left behind by Shimano. In my opinion.

  5. Sram really pissed me off with the a apex asymmetrical bolt pattern on their crank. You have literally zero option to go smaller. Not even third party

    1. It seems incompatibility with everyone else was one of the main goals with AXS, if not THE main goal. I guess SRAM have enough fanboys that they dont care. 🙁

    2. I agree. It’s like the marketers have taken over the company. I didn’t pay attention to this when I bought the bike and it’s so frustrating.

  6. Nice review but I have to add one comment. SRAMs Cage Lock should be on every gravel and mtb RD. It is a simple bit of engineering and worth its weight in gold when making a roadside/ trailside fix with everything caked in mud. I only ride Sram derailleur for this reason alone

    1. Naturally, I totally forgot to add Rotor, so I will update the article soon as I have all of the info, including a review of the original Rotor Uno groupset.

      1. I don’t want to know about either 1x or 10T cogs, so that leaves SRAM out.

        As for Campag, according to their site the Chorus cranksets are available in 165, 170, 172.5 and 175mm; it would be unusual if they were not: https://www.campagnolo.com/AU/en/Components/chorus_crankset_12x2_speed

        In fact Shimano do offer 46×30 rings, just not on the fancier GRX crankset. I think we have Jay Petervary to blame for this; he likes pushing big gears, and h
        modified his Cutthroat to take road rings. Unfortunately the new v2 Cutthroat will only take 46×30 at the smallest, not exactly low with 29″ wheels. 🙁

        IMHO, 46×30 is still too big for many uses. For one day gravel races and those who like to push big gears, okay, but for bikepacking or touring the gearing is still too high. Given the GRX bcd should take rings down to 26T I’m hoping that someone like TA or Blackspire will offer smaller inner and outer rings.

        And yes, Shimano should offer something in between 11-34 and 11-40. However, I doubt they will as I suspect 11 speed is over for them and anything road-ish released from now on will be 12 speed. I sincerely hope they don’t try to force MicroSpline and 10T cogs down our throats. If they do I’ll be stocking up on 11 speed parts.

  7. Two years ago I have contacted a Chinese guy from S-Ride to discuss a mega range and Shimano compatible rear derailleur. Now at the end of August I got the first sample which is fully compatible with Shimano 11 speed STI shifters and can handle cassettes up to 11-50 with a difference of 10 teeth on the double crankset. So my actual setup is: Ultegra 11 speed STI shifters with a 11-50 cassette and a crankset of 46/36. but you can run also a single chainring crank.
    I think it is a solution for all the people who are doing bikepacking or long distance riders.
    The rear derailleur is not know at the moment, but will come up at the beginning of January.

    1. Why do this? 11-50 11 speed cassettes have some pretty huge gaps towards the upper end of the range. 36×50 is a very similar low gear to 26×36, 29×40 or 30×42, all of which can be achieved using a. more normal rear derailleur; 42T might need a MTB RD (or a Roadlink – shudder), but 40T or less will work with current Shimano long arm road derailleurs. I’d personally rather have a smaller, lighter cassette, more ground clearance, a smaller inner chainring and closer gaps between the gears.

      1. Stephen, the 36-50 solution is um h better than the samples you mentioned. I have built gravel bikes for bike packing riders using 10sp XT derailleur (cassette 11-42) and FSA cranks 44/28 (without using Tanpan or Wolftooth Roadlink) This works very well, but actually there no solution for 11 speed derailleurs.
        Wolftooth Roadlink is not that easy in terms of the lower gears. Shifting precision in lower gears are poor.
        And – I don‘t know what kind of rides you are doing – but people with bike packing activities on long distances are very happy to have a „lifebelt“ for the Last kilometers uphill. And in addition with the 46/36 you have a little bit more speed on flat roads. So at the end it is a question of personal taste to accept the gaps at the upper end. But ist is great solution for 11sp STI shifter without using any tinker solutions. The shifting quality is very good as well in lower as in high gears.

  8. Most complete review I’ve seen! Great write up. Sounds like I’m going DI2 GRX based on this review. I was wondering how I wanted to build my next bike and this took me over the top. Thanks man! Hope to see you again at Monster Cross. Need you to pull harder this time on the parkway! Ha.

    1. Thanks Brad, this isn’t really a full on review, just my thoughts an opinions on what’s out there… I do have a proper long-term review of GRX Di2 appearing later, but you will not be disappointed with it… it is simply the best groupset going.

  9. For gravel bike packing, the last thing I want to worry about is a flat battery. I have had Di-2 go flat if the gear lever is inadvertently compressed when transporting the bike. Carrying a spare for SRAM seems retrograde. Changing gears manually, has never slowed my travels. I use 1x 12 speed 10-50 SRAM Eagle on my mountain bikes. With 12 speed the gear steps are not a problem. ( Even Shimano only uses 13 actual gears in their SynchroShift mode ) I agree with with Bike Nerd above. Both Shimano and SRAM really need to develop 12 speed mechanical road shifters, that can work with their 12 speed mountain bike cassettes and derailleurs – even if you want to run 1 x 12 using a narrower spread

  10. Why did you put “Braking is improved with the higher pivot point of the GRX shifter lever”
    in “Shimano Mechanical Disc Brake Groupsets” section?

    higher pivot point is only used in “Shimano Electronic Disc Brake Groupsets”

      1. Hi JOM – I’m not trying to be rude, but how sure are you about that? The reason I ask is that at least one or two of the pieces written after GRX was released said that the relocated pivot point was only on Di2, IIRC becsuse there wasn’t room to do it with mechanical.

        The Shimano GRX consumer PDF says, “The ST-RX815 levers receive an 18mm higher brake axis which provides a bit more leverage” and a bit lower, “The ST-RX810 and RX600 shift levers will be the two 11-speed mechanical options. These also receive an updated, textured brake lever blade while using the current mechanical hydro brake lever body and hood.” This certainly seems to me to mean that only the Di2 levers have the higher pivot, given the body is unchanged.

        I haven’t seen any GRX here in Oz yet, and it seems one can only buy the levers in sets with the flat mount GRX calipers; both of my frames are post mount. 🙁

        1. Stephen, this wouldn’t be the first time I am wrong! Based on what you have posted, that seems to be the case. Oops.

          Regarding your issue, there are adapters for flat mount frames to post mount brakes but not the other way around… at least none I have seen.

          1. According to shimano usa dealers faq and page 12 of 22 from “grx doc consumer pdf” (google) only di2 lever have 18mm pivot axle offset

  11. Thanks so much for this overview! I built up my Devinci Hatchet with SRAM Red Etap (1st Gen) WiFli (long cage) and have been running it with a rotor 2inpower crankset with a 46/30 chainring and 11-36 SRAM cassette. To get things to work well, I had to use a Sugino MT-OX Adjustable FD mount to get the SRAM eTap FD low enough to make the shifting crisp. For most gravel rides in Ontario it has been pretty good, but I did a bikepacking event this past summer, where I felt like I needed some lower gears. I don’t think I can get a bigger cassette (11-40) to work with the current SRAM RD, so am looking at some Shimano options (likely the cheapest). I’m thinking that I could run the GRX 815 RD and FD with an 11-40 cassette, with new shift levers, but do I need to replace the crankset? Will a normal crankset work with GRX?

    1. I don’t see any issues with a regular crankset and GRX… but as always, nothing can be confirmed until someone gives it a whirl!

      1. GRX has the chainline 2.5mm further out than normal road cranks, and Shimano say you should use a GRX FD. Conversely, I’d expect a road FD to be happier with a normal chainline.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.